Where Stephen spoke about the rapid change in the online world, and how librarians must take up free, easy-to-use web 2.0 tools to engage with our customers, Tara spoke and about the need to put some depth and context into the online experience. Here are some dot points I made from her presentation - not sure I agree with every detail, but her overall direction gave me food for thought.
- spoke about Wikipedia and blogs and the rise of mediocrity
- there is a great need for information literacy
- use of google by undergraduate students - subtle wearing away of the value of research
- there is an (incorrect) assumption that if people get millions of results from a google search, that they have the intelligence to interpret those results
- the whole ethos of google search is based on mathematics, not humanities / social sciences
- google page-rank results in confusion between popularity and quality
- blogs - people overvaluing the minutia of their day
- wiki contributors - anti-intellectuals with time on their hands
- are we prepared to trade speed for accuracy? (ability for wikipedia to quickly update to changing circumstances)
- Tara has observed a general decline in comprehension skills by her students - if they see text on a screen, it must be true
- She struggles to get undergraduate students to find and use 10 references for assignments
- Librarians and teachers need to highlight the quality websites to our students and users
- google scholar is an important development - at least it is alerting people to the fact that there are different kinds of information
- problem is not google, it is the google-effect. The degradation of education, the flattening of intellectual curiosity
- Libraries do not provide information - we provide a way through information
I'll take away from this a renewed interest in information literacy (and how we can make it useful and fun for our users), a renewed appreciation of the value and potential our Searchlight column has, and a renewed commitment to the value of public libraries.